Saturday, November 17, 2007
Spectacular Balls
"All our Daily Show clips were pulled off YouTube by Viacom, who is suing them for a billion dollars. That was not at our instigation – we were happy for people to watch the clips. But instead they wanted to set up a website where they can sell advertising while the clip is buffering, although I thought we were at the point where clips don’t need to buffer anymore. So you have to watch a commercial for thirty seconds or whatever. So they’re clearly making money on that; they’re also clearly making money because they’re suing YouTube for a billion. So that seems quite strange when they’re saying, “Well, there’s no money to be made off the internet but we’re suing YouTube for a billion dollars.” That takes spectacular balls! There are so many areas of it that seem so desperately unfair."
- The Daily Show's John Oliver regarding the current writers' strike
http://gothamist.com/2007/11/15/john_oliver_wri.php
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Things I Never Thought I'd Say
My Bloody Valentine Are Back
Sweet. And this isn't one of those neverending-tour cash-in type reunions, apparently they're actually going to finish that Loveless follow-up they started 14 years ago and abandoned 11 years ago and put it out next year, which means this is already more exciting than the Pixies' promise of a new album and consequent quashing of that promise because notoriously difficult bassist Kim Deal (with it?) decided she "didn't need another Pixies record." Well as long as she's happy.
Michael Bay Made A Good Movie
The first thing on my post-exam to-do list, before having a much needed haircut, was to get around to seeing that most will-it-or-won't-it-suck of movies, Transformers. I used to love the old animated series as a kid (actually I was a fanatic) but when I heard this was being made I thought it sounded like the dumbest idea for a live action film since John Rambo, and with Bay attached I felt pretty confident in that assertion. Then something strange happened: people liked it. And rather than appealing to nobody it made $700m worldwide. At which point I went "hmm" or something and pretended I was a Netflix subscriber adding it to my imaginary queue. I then imagined it'd probably reached the top of that queue around exam time so I resolved to finally watch the damn thing once they were over, and to ensure that I'd at least get to see one enjoyable film that evening I grabbed Danny Boyle's Sunshine in a 2-for-1 deal.
Sunshine opens by ripping off the opening mess hall scenes from Alien and then proceeds to rip-off 2001 and Solaris in equal measure for the rest of its story, occasionally distancing itself from those films by replacing something awesome that they did with something new and crap. The set-up is that the sun's dying and some astronauts have to plant a giant bomb on/in it to reignite it, and that they're the second mission sent to do so after the previous one "mysteriously disappeared" seven years ago. All of which you've already seen before. By the one hour mark it's actually still going along okayish with a fair balance of its aforementioned ripped-off elements creating enough tension and psychological drama for the film to be mildly enjoyable. Then one of the guys from the old mission - seven years ago - inexplicably appears on the new ship and tries to kill them all while ranting and raving about conversations with God and looking like he crashed into the make-up trailer shortly before they called action, which director Danny Boyle seems intent on covering up by shaking the camera and smearing the lense or something so you can't see him. Actually I think these techniques are employed to somehow make him seem scary, woefully copying the whole unseen-creature aspect of Alien. Either way, this plot twist is bizarre and unnecessary in equal measure. At best it could have turned out to be a poorly-conceived low-effort method of setting-up for some great final pay-off, or at least one of those pretentious philosophical-ramble types of pay-offs that these types of movies seem to love, but instead it all goes absolutely nowhere and the character could have been (and should have been) omitted entirely. Oh and then the movie ends all happy. They blow up the bomb somehow and all die but then we see dancing children holding hands and prancing with deer as they look to the bright sun and see that all is well. At some point Boyle and writer Alex Garland forgot what movie they were making.
So my evening looked ruined until Michael Bay delivered the upset of his career. Transformers is (almost) brilliant (for a Hollywood action movie). Just as Batman Begins nailed its grittier tone and more realistic take on things, Transformers finds its own perfect balance because it realises it's about giant talking robots that can change into stuff and doesn't take itself too seriously. It's just so damn well written for 100 minutes, Shia Leboeuf (sp?) nailing his lines and role in general for 100 minutes and Michael Bay proving, for 100 minutes, that he can actually competently bring good material to life. Then after 100 minutes he goes back to blowing shit up, allowing the characters to become faceless pawns designated at random to partake in empty action set-pieces that go on way too long and suck all the life and humour out of the film. Hmm. But for 100 minutes I wasn't just enjoying myself, I was genuinely blown away. By Michael freakin' Bay. How?
I think even Bay himself realises he's turned a bit of a corner with this film; at one point some guy goes "this is a thousand times cooler than armageddon!" for a bit of self-referential back-patting.
Third Sign Of The Apocalypse...
...would if the new MBV record is actually up to par, seeing as reunion albums always come across as forced grabs at past glories (or else see bands attempt to adapt to more "modern" sounds without undergoing a natural progression of their sound over time) and, as a consequence, always suck. At least some of the material will be old stuff, from when they were still together, so that's promising. Less promising is that they didn't see fit to release it at the time...
My Bloody Valentine's "Only Shallow" (from Loveless, 1991)
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Gary Kemble Must Lose
"Film is a visual medium" - Random Primordia promotional email. Urgh.
Edit
Ya- No! We're winning 12-0! Must resist... Kiwi pride... think of long term chances... of winning the... cup... Damn you Kemble!
Shit. I'm enjoying this :(
Edit Again
Never mind. The Kiwis lost AND the gave me 25 minutes of enjoyable play before the usual capitulation - that's probably the best scenario I could have hoped for. See ya Gary. Plus next year we should have Benji Marshall, Brent Webb, Francis Meli, Ali Lauiti'iti and Sonny Bill Williams in the squad and probably others I can't think of off the top of my head, ensuring the Lions do an All Blacks and peak now to lose when it matters most. The Kangaroos (who may as well just field Melbourne plus Matt King and Darren Lockyer) will win the World Cup anyway, but at least they'll beat us in the final. That's what matters, that all important first-loser spot on the podium.
Oh and apparently Malawi's complaining that they only lost (85-26) to the Silver Ferns because... they had to play indoors. Aww. How sneaky of the Ferns to pull that stunt. It's like saying the Kiwis would have won the series but the Lions insisted on playing league instead of hosting homoerotic cooking wars.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
She Hate Me
"Russell Crowe Drinks Wine For Two Hours" (aka "A Good Year") goes beyond mere "What was Ridley Scott thinking" and plows headlong into "This can't be Ridley Scott" territory. After the first hour and a half of uneventful poolside wine-drinking, you're more likely to believe that there is a second director named Ridley Scott, or that Ridley Scott was replaced by a replicated robot whose primary function is to monitor Russell Crowe's alcohol consumption.
...
No, our problem is that Gilliam, anticipating people not liking his movie, is explaining that it's the fault of the viewer for watching it wrong, and that they should re-watch it while pretending they're a little kid. You made a shitty movie, Terry Gilliam, now live with it. You didn't see Coppola make a speech before "Jack" saying "Look, folks, this movie blows, but when you watch it, imagine yourself as a person with really shitty taste in movies and I think you'll really enjoy it."
